Papers by Hal Daumé Iii

11 papers
SMARTER: A Data-efficient Framework to Improve Toxicity Detection with Explanation via Self-augmenting Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Toxic content encompasses a wide spectrum of terminologies whose definitions vary by platform.
Approach: They propose a 2-stage framework for explainable content moderation using Large Language Models (LLMs) they leverage LLMs’ own outputs to generate synthetic explanations for correct and incorrect labels . they refine explanation quality through cross-model training, allowing weaker models to align with stronger ones.
Outcome: Experiments on 3 benchmarks show that the proposed framework achieves 13% macro-F1 improvement over few-shot baselines using only 6-57% of training data.
Toxicity Detection is NOT all you Need: Measuring the Gaps to Supporting Volunteer Content Moderators through a User-Centric Method (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing efforts to automate content moderation have focused on identifying toxic, offensive, and hateful content . yet, it remains unclear whether improvements have addressed the needs of volunteer content moderators .
Approach: They propose to use a model review to examine the availability of moderators' models to flag violations of various forum rules.
Outcome: The proposed models perform poorly on a significant portion of the rules.
Can You Make It Sound Like You? Post-Editing LLM-Generated Text for Personal Style (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite the growing use of large language models for writing tasks, it remains unclear whether users can effectively reshape LLM-generated text to reflect their personal style.
Approach: They conduct an online study in which participants post-edit LLM-generated drafts for writing tasks where personal style matters to them.
Outcome: The results show that post-editing increases stylistic similarity to unassisted writing and reduces similarity with fully LLM-generated output.
HateCOT: An Explanation-Enhanced Dataset for Generalizable Offensive Speech Detection via Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Social media has amplified the propagation of hateful sentiments, highlighting the contested nature of "offensive content" research shows that "of offensive content" is still a contested construct due to varying definitions and labeling.
Approach: They propose a dataset that features human-curated explanations for offensive content in English . they show that HateCOT pretraining improves performance of open-source LLMs .
Outcome: The proposed model improves on three benchmark datasets for offensive content detection . the model improve the quality of its explanations, as confirmed by the human evaluation .
Reheat Nachos for Dinner? Evaluating AI Support for Cross-Cultural Communication of Neologisms (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neologisms and emerging slang are central to daily conversation, yet challenging for non-native speakers (NNS) to interpret and use appropriately in cross-cultural communication with native speakers (NS).
Approach: They use AI to learn English neologisms and write messages using the learned word to an NS friend.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that AI Explanation yields the largest gains over no support in NS-rated competence, while contextual appropriateness judgments show indifference across support.
ASL STEM Wiki: Dataset and Benchmark for Interpreting STEM Articles (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Deaf and hard-of-hearing students face significant barriers in accessing STEM education due to the scarcity of STEM resources in signed languages.
Approach: They develop models to identify fingerspelled words in American Sign Language (ASL) given an English sentence and a video, the model detects which English phrase is fingerspelled in the clip.
Outcome: ASL STEM Wiki is the first continuous signing dataset focused on STEM . it detects fingerspelled words and queries them for appropriate signs to suggest to interpreters.
Do great minds think alike? Investigating Human-AI Complementarity in Question Answering with CAIMIRA (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models have led to claims of AI surpassing humans in QA tasks . authors: models are purportedly acing tests that many humans find challenging .
Approach: They propose a framework that enables quantitative assessment and comparison of problem-solving abilities in QA agents.
Outcome: The proposed framework uncovers distinctficiency patterns in knowledge domains and reasoning skills.
“You Gotta be a Doctor, Lin” : An Investigation of Name-Based Bias of Large Language Models in Employment Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated racial and gender biases in various applications.
Approach: They use Large Language Models to simulate hiring decisions and salary recommendations for candidates with 320 first names that strongly signal their race and gender, across over 750,000 prompts.
Outcome: The proposed models favor candidates with White female-sounding names over other demographic groups across 40 occupations.
Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness – Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for accessing information on the web.
Approach: They conduct experiments with 80 crowdworkers to compare LLMs with search engines . they ask LLM to provide contrastive information to reduce over-reliance on LLM .
Outcome: The results show that LLMs can outperform search engines but not LLM explanations . the study shows that LMS explanations are not reliable replacements for reading retrieved passages compared to search engines alone.
Understanding the Impacts of Language Technologies’ Performance Disparities on African American Language Speakers (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Previous work has examined performance disparities between AAL speakers and White Mainstream English speakers . but, this work has not sought to understand the impacts of these disparities on AAL speaker.
Approach: They examine the experiences of African American Language (AAL) speakers when using language technologies.
Outcome: The authors interview 19 AAL speakers to understand performance disparities . they find that speakers often undertake invisible labor to successfully use language technologies .
Successfully Guiding Humans with Imperfect Instructions by Highlighting Potential Errors and Suggesting Corrections (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing systems that only provide instructions generate inaccurate instructions . however, language models can still guide humans toward making sound decisions .
Approach: They develop a system that can detect and correct errors in natural language instructions . it can also be used to narrow down search space and reduce misguidance .
Outcome: The proposed system achieves a 13% increase in success rate and a 29% reduction in final location error distance with 80 users.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations